From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Meadows v. Sheldon Pollack Corp.

Supreme Court of Nevada
Nov 19, 1976
92 Nev. 636 (Nev. 1976)

Summary

holding that a breach of contract claim relating to an elevator malfunction sounded in tort because it sought to recover for personal injuries

Summary of this case from Crabb v. Harmon Enters., Inc.

Opinion

No. 8464

November 19, 1976

Appeal from the Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Keith C. Hayes, J.

Daryl Engebregson, Las Vegas, for Appellant.

Peter Burleigh, Las Vegas, for Respondent.


OPINION


On October 10, 1974, appellant filed suit to recover for personal injuries suffered May 11, 1972, in a fall of an elevator manufactured by Montgomery Elevator Company and installed by respondent Sheldon Pollack Corporation. Finding the two-year statute of limitations (NRS 11.190(4)(e)) precluded appellant's action, the district court granted respondent's motion to dismiss. Here, appellant contends the district court erred by ruling the two-year statute of limitations was applicable. He also contends the trial court erred in ruling the provisions of NRS 11.205 inapplicable. We reject both contentions.

NRS 11.190(4)(e) provides:
"Actions other than those for the recovery of real property, unless further limited by NRS 11.205 or by or pursuant to the Uniform Commercial Code, can only be commenced as follows:
". . .
"4. Within 2 years:
". . .
"(e) An action to recover damages for injuries to a person or for the death of a person caused by the wrongful act or neglect of another. The provisions of this paragraph relating to an action to recover damages for injuries to a person shall apply only to causes of action which shall accrue after March 20, 1951."
Actions under NRS 11.205 must be brought within six (6) years.

1. Appellant argues the longer statute of limitations of NRS 11.190(1)(b) or 11.190(2)(c) govern because his action sounds in contract. However, the gravamen of his cause of action is in tort to recover damages for personal injuries; thus, the two-year limitation of NRS 11.190(4)(e) is applicable. See: Blotzke v. Christmas Tree, Inc., 88 Nev. 449, 499 P.2d 647 (1972); and, State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. v. Wharton, 88 Nev. 183, 495 P.2d 359 (1972).

The period of limitation in NRS 11.190(1)(b) is six (6) years; in NRS 11.190(2)(c), it is four (4) years.

2. Appellant cites no relevant authority in support of his argument that the provisions of NRS 11.205 are applicable; thus, we need not, and therefore do not, consider it. Alves v. Bumguardner, 91 Nev. 799, 544 P.2d 436 (1975).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Meadows v. Sheldon Pollack Corp.

Supreme Court of Nevada
Nov 19, 1976
92 Nev. 636 (Nev. 1976)

holding that a breach of contract claim relating to an elevator malfunction sounded in tort because it sought to recover for personal injuries

Summary of this case from Crabb v. Harmon Enters., Inc.

In Meadows, the Nevada Supreme Court followed the "gravamen of the action" test for determining which statute of limitations was applicable to a claim that sounded both in contract and tort law.

Summary of this case from Castillo v. W. Range Ass'n

explaining that although the plaintiff alleged breach of contract, "the gravamen of his cause of action is in tort to recover damages for personal injuries; thus, the two-year limitation of NRS 11.190(e) is applicable"

Summary of this case from Allen v. Zimmer Holdings, Inc.

explaining that although the plaintiff alleged breach of contract, "the gravamen of his cause of action is in tort to recover damages for personal injuries; thus, the two-year limitation of NRS 11.190(e) is applicable"

Summary of this case from Crabb v. Harmon Enters., Inc.

noting that because “the gravamen of [the parties] cause of action [was] in tort to recover damages for personal injuries ... the two year statute of limitation of NRS 11.190(e) ” applies.

Summary of this case from Dreyer-Lefevre v. Morissette
Case details for

Meadows v. Sheldon Pollack Corp.

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD E. MEADOWS, APPELLANT, v. SHELDON POLLACK CORPORATION, A FOREIGN…

Court:Supreme Court of Nevada

Date published: Nov 19, 1976

Citations

92 Nev. 636 (Nev. 1976)
556 P.2d 546

Citing Cases

Crabb v. Harmon Enters., Inc.

As a result, the relevant tort statute of limitations, and not a contract statute of limitations, applies to…

Rink v. Nevada, Dep’t of Agric.

In broad terms, the Nevada Supreme Court has long recognized that the four-year limitations period applies to…