From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McPherson v. New York City Housing Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 24, 1996
228 A.D.2d 654 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Summary

holding that "[t]he causal connection between a criminal act in an essentially open-air, public area, and any negligence on the part of the defendant, is too attenuated, as a matter of law, to serve as a basis for the plaintiffs’ recovery"

Summary of this case from Toussaint v. Cornell Univ.

Opinion

June 24, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vaccaro, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff Donna McPherson, a tenant in a public housing project owned by the defendant, suffered multiple gunshot wounds as she was sitting on a bench located outside of her building. This action was commenced against the defendant to recover damages for her personal injuries and for the alleged psychological harm to her son, who witnessed the shooting.

For liability to be imposed upon a governmental defendant for the breach of a duty which is governmental in nature, such as providing police protection and adequate security, a plaintiff tenant must show that the defendant breached a special duty to him or her ( see, Dawson v. New York City Hous. Auth., 203 A.D.2d 55; Harris v. New York City Hous. Auth., 187 A.D.2d 362, 363; Cuffy v. City of New York, 69 N.Y.2d 255). Here, the plaintiffs did not plead a special duty or show that a special relationship existed. In any event, the criminal act of the unknown assailant or assailants was not foreseeable in the normal course of events. In addition, any omission on the part of the defendant to provide security outside of the building cannot be said to be a substantial cause of the events which produced the injury. The causal connection between a criminal act in an essentially open-air, public area, and any negligence on the part of the defendant, is too attenuated, as a matter of law, to serve as a basis for the plaintiffs' recovery ( see, Miller v. State of New York, 62 N.Y.2d 506; Nallan v. Helmsley-Spear, Inc., 50 N.Y.2d 507, 519; Allen v. New York City Hous. Auth., 203 A.D.2d 313, 314; Matter of Sanchez v. New York City Hous. Auth., 194 A.D.2d 613; Blatt v. New York City Hous. Auth., 123 A.D.2d 591, 592-593). Bracken, J.P., Thompson, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

McPherson v. New York City Housing Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 24, 1996
228 A.D.2d 654 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

holding that "[t]he causal connection between a criminal act in an essentially open-air, public area, and any negligence on the part of the defendant, is too attenuated, as a matter of law, to serve as a basis for the plaintiffs’ recovery"

Summary of this case from Toussaint v. Cornell Univ.
Case details for

McPherson v. New York City Housing Authority

Case Details

Full title:DONNA McPHERSON et al., Appellants, v. NEW YORK CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 24, 1996

Citations

228 A.D.2d 654 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
646 N.Y.S.2d 16

Citing Cases

Dar Es Salaam Mosley v. City of New York

Based on Plaintiff s failure to state that a special duty was owed by Defendants to Mosley, her complaint (as…

Toussaint v. Cornell Univ.

However, the scope of the landowner's duty "is defined by past experience and the likelihood of conduct on…