From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

McLean v. Thatcher Process Company, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 1, 1925
214 App. Div. 842 (N.Y. App. Div. 1925)

Summary

In McLean v. Thatcher Process Co., Inc. (214 App. Div. 842), compensation award was denied on the ground that it did not appear that the child was an acknowledged illegitimate child within the meaning of the statute.

Summary of this case from Ciarlo v. New York City Employees' Retirement Sys

Opinion

September, 1925.


Award reversed and claim dismissed, with costs against the State Industrial Board, on the ground that the son for whose benefit the claim is made is not an acknowledged illegitimate child within the meaning of section 2, subdivision 11, of the Workmen's Compensation Law. All concur.


Summaries of

McLean v. Thatcher Process Company, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 1, 1925
214 App. Div. 842 (N.Y. App. Div. 1925)

In McLean v. Thatcher Process Co., Inc. (214 App. Div. 842), compensation award was denied on the ground that it did not appear that the child was an acknowledged illegitimate child within the meaning of the statute.

Summary of this case from Ciarlo v. New York City Employees' Retirement Sys
Case details for

McLean v. Thatcher Process Company, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Before STATE INDUSTRIAL BOARD, Respondent. GLADYS McLEAN, Respondent, v…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Sep 1, 1925

Citations

214 App. Div. 842 (N.Y. App. Div. 1925)

Citing Cases

Ciarlo v. New York City Employees' Retirement Sys

It may be of interest to note that the Industrial Board has ruled that an illegitimate child born after the…