finding instructions similar to those here to be confusing and conflicting, and thus a violation of due process
Summary of this case from Wiles v. RoofNos. 83-1659, 84-89.
October 1, 1984.
C.A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied. JUSTICE POWELL took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions. Reported below: 722 F. 2d 1370.
finding instructions similar to those here to be confusing and conflicting, and thus a violation of due process
Summary of this case from Wiles v. Rooftriggering event not specified but warrant issued upon information explicitly trying the search to a particular time, place and person
Summary of this case from State v. WrightFull title:McDONALD Et Al. v. JOHNSON JOHNSON; and JOHNSON JOHNSON v. McDONALD ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Oct 1, 1984
On remand, Smart waived a jury trial and was sentenced to two terms of life imprisonment. Smart subsequently…
Smart v. Leeke107 S.Ct. at 1102 fn.[**]. See Thomas v. Leeke, 725 F.2d 246 (4th Cir. 1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 870, 105…