Summary
dismissing action filed by McCracken on the same day as the instant action, sua sponte, on the grounds of failure to effect timely service upon defendants despite an extension of time to do so
Summary of this case from Mc Cracken v. R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant, LLCOpinion
5:08-CV-520.
June 24, 2009
TED A. McCRACKEN, Plaintiff, Pro Se, North Wales, PA.
DECISION and ORDER
Plaintiff, Ted A. McCracken, brought this action pursuant to 28:1331 in May 2008. By Report-Recommendation dated May 18, 2009, the Honorable George H. Lowe, United States Magistrate Judge, recommended that plaintiff's complaint be sua sponte dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute and for failure to comply with an order of the court pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b). There have been no objections made to the Report-Recommendation.
Based upon a careful review of the entire file and the recommendations of Magistrate Judge Lowe, the Report-Recommendation is accepted and adopted in whole. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1). Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that
1. The plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice; and
2. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.
IT IS SO ORDERED.