From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mauriello v. Mauriello

Connecticut Superior Court, Judicial District of Waterbury
May 29, 1992
1992 Ct. Sup. 4774 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1992)

Summary

In Mauriello, in addition to rejecting the claim of mistake, the court held that the mother "could have litigated the paternity of the minor child before entry of the final judgment.

Summary of this case from Drakeford v. Ward

Opinion

No. 084337

May 29, 1992


MEMORANDUM OF DECISION de DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO REOPEN AND MODIFY JUDGMENT (#118)


The parties' marriage was dissolved on July 11, 1988 at which time the parties presented a stipulation to the court accepted. Both parties represented to the court that there was one child issue of their marriage. The judgment awarded joint custody as the parties agreed with physical possession to the mother and rights of reasonable visitation to the father.

After the father had moved to modify judgment in order to incorporate a specific visitation schedule, and after the issue was referred to the Family Relations Office for mediation, the mother raised the issue of the child's paternity and seeks to open the judgment on the basis of mutual mistake.

However, the plaintiff has never doubted the paternity of the child and denies that any mistake exists.

The defendant could have litigated the paternity of the minor child before entry of the final judgment. Her assault upon the judgment is too late.

The defendant's motion to reopen the judgment is denied.

HARRIGAN, J.


Summaries of

Mauriello v. Mauriello

Connecticut Superior Court, Judicial District of Waterbury
May 29, 1992
1992 Ct. Sup. 4774 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1992)

In Mauriello, in addition to rejecting the claim of mistake, the court held that the mother "could have litigated the paternity of the minor child before entry of the final judgment.

Summary of this case from Drakeford v. Ward
Case details for

Mauriello v. Mauriello

Case Details

Full title:ALFREDO MAURIELLO v. JAIME MAURIELLO

Court:Connecticut Superior Court, Judicial District of Waterbury

Date published: May 29, 1992

Citations

1992 Ct. Sup. 4774 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1992)

Citing Cases

Martin v. Harrell

The importance of the principle of finality of judgment is amplified when the parties had full opportunity…

Drakeford v. Ward

The importance of the principle of finality of judgment is amplified when the parties had hill opportunity…