From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of United Security Corp. v. McGoldrick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 3, 1953
281 App. Div. 859 (N.Y. App. Div. 1953)

Summary

In Matter of United Security Corp. v. McGoldrick (281 App. Div. 859) the court modified the conditions of the installation of automatic elevators because "this more substantially equals the service rendered before the conversion and it had landlord's contemporary acquiescence as a condition of conversion."

Summary of this case from Matter of Konigsberg v. Caputa

Opinion

March 3, 1953.

Present — Dore, J.P., Cohn, Breitel and Bergan, JJ.


Order unanimously modified by reinstating the conditions stated in the order of the Administrator of September 25, 1951, which confirmed a determination of the local administrator allowing elevator conversion on condition that twenty-four-hour lobby attendant service be maintained by the landlord at the Riverside Drive entrance to the building, and sixteen-hour service at the 115th Street entrance and, as so modified, affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant. We are of opinion this more substantially equals the service rendered before the conversion and it had landlord's contemporary acquiescence as a condition of conversion. Settle order on notice.


Summaries of

Matter of United Security Corp. v. McGoldrick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 3, 1953
281 App. Div. 859 (N.Y. App. Div. 1953)

In Matter of United Security Corp. v. McGoldrick (281 App. Div. 859) the court modified the conditions of the installation of automatic elevators because "this more substantially equals the service rendered before the conversion and it had landlord's contemporary acquiescence as a condition of conversion."

Summary of this case from Matter of Konigsberg v. Caputa
Case details for

Matter of United Security Corp. v. McGoldrick

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of UNITED SECURITY CORPORATION, Appellant, against JOSEPH D…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 3, 1953

Citations

281 App. Div. 859 (N.Y. App. Div. 1953)

Citing Cases

Matter of Payson v. State Rent Comm

In my opinion it was not. It has been held that the protection provided tenants by the presence of elevator…

Matter of Konigsberg v. Caputa

Special Term reversed the determination of the State Rent Administrator and the Appellate Division reversed…