Summary
In United Petroleum, the agency followed the procedures mandated by SEQRA and reached the rational conclusion, supported by the record, that the proposed action would have no significant impact on the environment, obviating the need for preparation of an environmental impact statement (EIS).
Summary of this case from Inland Vale Farm Co. v. StergianopoulosOpinion
Argued April 22, 1985
Decided June 4, 1985
Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, John G. Connor, J.
G.S. Peter Bergen and Thomas E. Mark for appellant.
Robert Abrams, Attorney-General ( Francis J. Keehan, Robert Hermann, Peter H. Schiff and James A. Sevinsky of counsel), for respondent.
Usher Fogel and Emilio Petroccione for Empire State Petroleum Association, Inc., amicus curiae.
Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion by Justice John T. Casey at the Appellate Division ( 102 A.D.2d 491).
Concur: Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges JASEN, MEYER, SIMONS, KAYE and ALEXANDER. Taking no part: Judge TITONE.