Opinion
October 19, 1998
Appeal from the Family Court, Dutchess County (Amodeo, J.).
Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
No appeal lies from an order denying resettlement of the decretal paragraphs of an order ( see, Masters, Inc. v. White House Discounts, 119 A.D.2d 639; Foertsch v. Foertsch, 187 A.D.2d 635; Bergin v. Anderson, 216 App. Div. 844). Therefore, the appeal from the order dated June 10, 1997, must be dismissed. Were we to reach the merits, we would find that since the petitioner seeks to challenge only so much of the order of disposition as placed him in a limited secure facility, the appeal is academic as the original period of placement has expired ( see, Matter of C. Children, 252 A.D.2d 523; Matter of Latonia J., 249 A.D.2d 546; Matter of Giovanni P., 236 A.D.2d 411) and the petitioner consented to the extension of placement in the limited secure facility.
Rosenblatt, J. P., O'Brien, Sullivan, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.