From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Norstar Apartments v. Town of Clay

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 12, 1985
112 A.D.2d 750 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Summary

noting that "[i]t is of little consequence whether intervention is warranted as of right under CPLR 1012, or as a matter of discretion under CPLR 1013."

Summary of this case from Gladstein v. Martorella

Opinion

July 12, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Roy, J.

Present — Dillon, P.J., Callahan, Doerr, Boomer and Schnepp, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed, without costs, on the law and in the exercise of discretion, and motion granted. Memorandum: In these tax certiorari proceedings brought by Norstar Apartments, Inc., seeking reduction of its assessments for the tax years 1983-1984 and 1984-1985, it was improper for Special Term to deny the motion of the Board of Education of the Liverpool Central School District to intervene. It is of little consequence whether intervention is warranted as of right under CPLR 1012 (a), or as a matter of discretion under CPLR 1013 (2 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, N Y Civ Prac ¶ 1012.05). Where, as here, the intervenor has a real and substantial interest in the outcome of the proceedings, intervention should be allowed ( Plantech Hous. v. Conlan, 74 A.D.2d 920; Matter of Cavages, Inc. v. Ketter, 56 A.D.2d 730). It is undisputed that if it is ultimately found that the subject property was overassessed, the school district will be required to refund excess taxes which it received ( cf. Vantage Petroleum v. Board of Assessment Review, 61 N.Y.2d 695).

There is no merit to the argument that the motion is untimely. No showing has been made that intervention will unduly delay the trial or other disposition of these proceedings ( cf. Matter of Buffalo Mall v. Assessor of Town of Clarence, 101 A.D.2d 701). Absent a showing of prejudice resulting from delay in seeking intervention, the motion should not be denied as untimely ( Matter of Ginsberg v. Lomenzo, 23 N.Y.2d 94; 2 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, N Y Civ Prac ¶ 1014.02).


Summaries of

Matter of Norstar Apartments v. Town of Clay

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 12, 1985
112 A.D.2d 750 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

noting that "[i]t is of little consequence whether intervention is warranted as of right under CPLR 1012, or as a matter of discretion under CPLR 1013."

Summary of this case from Gladstein v. Martorella
Case details for

Matter of Norstar Apartments v. Town of Clay

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of NORSTAR APARTMENTS, INC., Respondent, v. TOWN OF CLAY et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 12, 1985

Citations

112 A.D.2d 750 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

U.S. Bank Nat'Lass'N v. Kim Barra, Michael Barra, Arrow Fin. Servs., LLC

" McKinney's CPLR §1012 [2018]. The principal guideposts in the evaluation of timeliness are whether…

Mikedp Ventures, LLC II v. Green

CPLR Section 1012 (a) (2) and (3) allows intervention as of right when the action involves a disposition of…