From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Mashnouk v. Miles

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 9, 1981
80 A.D.2d 855 (N.Y. App. Div. 1981)

Opinion

March 9, 1981


In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel the City of Newburgh to recompute petitioner's retirement payments retroactive to January 1, 1980 to include regular salary increments to firefighters, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Orange County, dated August 28, 1980, which granted the petitioner's application. Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and proceeding dismissed on the merits. Based upon the language of subdivisions 1, 2 and 3 of section 207-a Gen. Mun. of the General Municipal Law, along with the legislative history of the 1977 amendment to that section (see Governor's Memorandum upon approving L 1977, ch 965, N.Y. Legis Ann, 1977, p 336; Bill No. 4764 in Assembly, dated Feb. 24, 1977; see, also, Bill No. 10709 in Assembly, dated March 25, 1980), we hold that the phrase "regular salary or wages" as employed in subdivision 2 of section 207-a Gen. Mun. of the General Municipal Law refers to a disabled fireman's salary as of the time of his retirement and should not reflect prospective salary increases of firemen. As such, petitioner is not entitled to the difference between his salary at the time of retirement and subsequent wage increases. Mangano, J.P., Cohalan, O'Connor and Weinstein, JJ., concur. [ 106 Misc.2d 147.]


Summaries of

Matter of Mashnouk v. Miles

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 9, 1981
80 A.D.2d 855 (N.Y. App. Div. 1981)
Case details for

Matter of Mashnouk v. Miles

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MICHAEL J. MASHNOUK, Respondent, v. FREDERICK MILES, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 9, 1981

Citations

80 A.D.2d 855 (N.Y. App. Div. 1981)

Citing Cases

Matter of Chalachan v. City of Binghamton

ailable to actively employed firefighters pursuant to union contracts with municipalities throughout the…

Harzinski v. Village of Endicott

Those who receive benefits under subdivision 2 are retired and, therefore, they are no longer employees of…