Opinion
April 9, 1998
Appeal from the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board.
Claimant was a laborer for the employer, a plywood manufacturer, until he was terminated for, inter alia, fighting with a co-worker. Substantial evidence supports the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board's decision which ruled that claimant's actions constituted misconduct under the Labor Law and that he was therefore disqualified from receiving benefits. Regardless of who initiated it, fighting with a co-worker during working hours may constitute disqualifying misconduct ( see, Matter of Rush [Sweeney], 244 A.D.2d 689; Matter of Marcus [Sweeney], 235 A.D.2d 886, 887; Matter of Perry [Sweeney], 222 A.D.2d 924). Claimant's assertion that he acted in self-defense and appropriately under the circumstances presented a credibility issue which the Board could properly choose to resolve against him ( see, Matter of Agis [Sweeney], 242 A.D.2d 819).
Mikoll, J.P., White, Peters, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur.
Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.