From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Marcus

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 23, 1997
235 A.D.2d 886 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

January 23, 1997.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 5, 1995, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Yesawich Jr., Peters, Spain and Carpinello, JJ.


Claimant was employed as a clerical worker for a heating oil delivery company when he became embroiled in a dispute with a co-worker and threatened him with a knife. As a result, claimant was discharged from his employment. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board found claimant to be disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he lost his employment due to misconduct. We agree. Substantial evidence in the record supports the finding that claimant participated in a fight during working hours and such participation was sufficient to constitute disqualifying misconduct ( see, Matter of Kilgore [Triboro Coach Corp." Sweeney], 227 AD2d 710; Matter of Redjepi [Hudacs], 210 AD2d 727, 728).

Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Matter of Marcus

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 23, 1997
235 A.D.2d 886 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Matter of Marcus

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of JACK H. MARCUS, Appellant. JOHN E. SWEENEY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jan 23, 1997

Citations

235 A.D.2d 886 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
652 N.Y.S.2d 1019

Citing Cases

Matter of the Claim of Mears

Claimant walked away and returned with an open box cutter at his side stating, "What do you have to say now?…

Matter of Santana

Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that claimant lost his…