From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Kenney v. Lord Taylor, Inc.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 3, 1930
173 N.E. 853 (N.Y. 1930)

Summary

In Kenney v. Lord Taylor, 254 N.Y. 532, 173 N.E. 853, an employee dancing after a dinner given by her employer to the employees of a store was held entitled to compensation.

Summary of this case from Geary v. Anaconda Copper Min. Co.

Opinion

Argued May 12, 1930

Decided June 3, 1930

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

T. Carlyle Jones and Clarence E. Mellen for appellants.

Hamilton Ward, Attorney-General ( E.C. Aiken of counsel), for respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: POUND, CRANE, O'BRIEN and HUBBS, JJ. Dissenting: CARDOZO, Ch. J., and KELLOGG, J. Not sitting: LEHMAN, J.


Summaries of

Matter of Kenney v. Lord Taylor, Inc.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 3, 1930
173 N.E. 853 (N.Y. 1930)

In Kenney v. Lord Taylor, 254 N.Y. 532, 173 N.E. 853, an employee dancing after a dinner given by her employer to the employees of a store was held entitled to compensation.

Summary of this case from Geary v. Anaconda Copper Min. Co.
Case details for

Matter of Kenney v. Lord Taylor, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of MARGARET KENNEY, Respondent, against LORD…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 3, 1930

Citations

173 N.E. 853 (N.Y. 1930)
173 N.E. 853

Citing Cases

Matter of Wilson v. General Motors Corp.

Other instances are found in the three cases cited by Judge CONWAY in his dissent ( 298 N.Y. 475, 482). In…

Ott v. Industrial Commission

The Supreme Court has not had before it the exact situation here presented, although other courts in other…