From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Golimowski v. Bellamy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 19, 1997
244 A.D.2d 1001 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

November 19, 1997

(Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Bergin, J. — CPLR art 78.)

Present — Green, J. P., Lawton, Callahan, Doerr and Balio, JJ.


Judgment unanimously reversed on the law without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in granting the petition challenging respondents' determination that petitioner is not qualified for the position of police officer. Respondents are "afforded wide discretion in determining the fitness of candidates for appointment. Such discretion is particularly necessary in hiring police officers, to whom higher standards of fitness and character may be applied (see, Matter of Havern v. Senko, 210 A.D.2d 480)" (Matter of Ressa v. County of Nassau, 224 A.D.2d 534). The exercise of that discretion will not be disturbed unless the determination is "irrational and arbitrary so as to warrant judicial intervention" (Matter of Choset v. Nassau County Civ. Serv. Commn., 199 A.D.2d 264, 265). Upon our review of the record, including the results of the psychological evaluation and background investigation conducted by respondents, we conclude that respondents did not act irrationally or arbitrarily in determining that petitioner is not qualified for the position of police officer (see, Matter of Brussel v. LoGrande, 137 A.D.2d 686; Matter of Metzger v. Nassau County Civ. Serv. Commn., 54 A.D.2d 565, 566).


Summaries of

Matter of Golimowski v. Bellamy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 19, 1997
244 A.D.2d 1001 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Matter of Golimowski v. Bellamy

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of FRANK GOLIMOWSKI, Respondent, v. WENDELL L. BELLAMY, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 19, 1997

Citations

244 A.D.2d 1001 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
668 N.Y.S.2d 968

Citing Cases

Rao v. Schneider

Contrary to the petitioner's contention, the respondents did not act irrationally or arbitrarily in relying…

Opn. No. 98-F8

Although certain persons convicted of either State felonies or misdemeanor crimes of domestic violence may…