From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Giammarino v. Ward

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 17, 1990
161 A.D.2d 440 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

May 17, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County, David H. Edwards, Jr., J.


There was substantial evidence to support the Commissioner's determination that a reasonable suspicion existed to require petitioner to submit to urinalysis. Statements made by a fellow officer that he had used cocaine with petitioner created the necessary "founded suspicion". (People v. De Bour, 40 N.Y.2d 210, 215.) Moreover, the statement was reliable as it constituted a declaration against the fellow officer's penal interest and was based upon personal knowledge. (Supra.) Accordingly, respondent's determination was based upon substantial evidence. (300 Gramatan Ave. Assocs. v. State Div. of Human Rights, 45 N.Y.2d 176.)

Concur — Ross, J.P., Asch, Kassal, Wallach and Smith, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Giammarino v. Ward

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 17, 1990
161 A.D.2d 440 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Matter of Giammarino v. Ward

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MICHAEL GIAMMARINO, Petitioner, v. BENJAMIN WARD, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 17, 1990

Citations

161 A.D.2d 440 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
555 N.Y.S.2d 358

Citing Cases

Matter of Roy v. City of New York

February 18, 1999 The information supplied by an informant that she had observed petitioner using drugs on…

Matter of Giammarino v. Ward

Decided July 2, 1990 Appeal from (1st Dept: 161 A.D.2d 440) MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL GRANTED OR…