From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Elbin Realty No. 2, Inc. v. Boyland

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 20, 1965
209 N.E.2d 103 (N.Y. 1965)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

applying GCL § 25-a to § 160 of the New York City Charter

Summary of this case from Rudin v. Tax Commission of New York (In re Olympia & York Maiden Lane Co.)
See 1 Summary

Opinion

Argued April 15, 1965

Decided May 20, 1965

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, PETER M. DALY, J.

Leo A. Larkin, Corporation Counsel ( Edith I. Spivack, Edward J. McLaughlin and Russell D. Scott of counsel), for appellants.

Herbert Rubin for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI and BERGAN.

Summaries of

Matter of Elbin Realty No. 2, Inc. v. Boyland

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 20, 1965
209 N.E.2d 103 (N.Y. 1965)

applying GCL § 25-a to § 160 of the New York City Charter

Summary of this case from Rudin v. Tax Commission of New York (In re Olympia & York Maiden Lane Co.)
Case details for

Matter of Elbin Realty No. 2, Inc. v. Boyland

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ELBIN REALTY NO. 2, INC., Respondent, v. WILLIAM E…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 20, 1965

Citations

209 N.E.2d 103 (N.Y. 1965)
209 N.E.2d 103
261 N.Y.S.2d 56

Citing Cases

Mandel v. Board of Assessors

RPTL 516 (1) requires the Town's assessor, in any given tax year, to complete and file the final assessment…

Rudin v. Tax Commission of New York (In re Olympia & York Maiden Lane Co.)

As noted, the thrust of the defendants' argument in opposition to Rudin's motion, and in support of their…

2 Citing Cases