From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Eisenberg Farms, Inc. v. Baldwin

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 20, 1934
193 N.E. 434 (N.Y. 1934)

Summary

In Eisenberg Farms, Inc. v. Baldwin, 265 N.Y. 662, 193 N.E. 434, it was contended that the New York milk control law was unconstitutional because it failed to require co-operative associations to return to their producers the prices fixed by the state milk control law.

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Rock Royal Co-op

Opinion

Argued October 25, 1934

Decided November 20, 1934

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

Max Rothenberg and John J. Scully for appellant.

Henry S. Manley for respondent.

Seward A. Miller and Frank B. Lent for Dairymen's League Co-operative Association, Inc., intervener.


Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: POUND, Ch. J., CRANE, LEHMAN, O'BRIEN, HUBBS, CROUCH and LOUGHRAN, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Eisenberg Farms, Inc. v. Baldwin

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 20, 1934
193 N.E. 434 (N.Y. 1934)

In Eisenberg Farms, Inc. v. Baldwin, 265 N.Y. 662, 193 N.E. 434, it was contended that the New York milk control law was unconstitutional because it failed to require co-operative associations to return to their producers the prices fixed by the state milk control law.

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Rock Royal Co-op
Case details for

Matter of Eisenberg Farms, Inc. v. Baldwin

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of EISENBERG FARMS, INC., Appellant, against CHARLES H…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 20, 1934

Citations

193 N.E. 434 (N.Y. 1934)
193 N.E. 434

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Rock Royal Co-op

Board of Trade of City of Chicago v. Olsen, 262 U.S. 1, 43 S.Ct. 470, 67 L.Ed. 839, has no analogy. In…

Co-Operative Dairymen of Fraser, New York, Inc. v. Ten Eyck

The law has been held valid and constitutional as to its price-fixing provisions. ( People v. Nebbia, 262…