From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Baskin v. Zoning Bd. of Apps., Tn. of Ramapo

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 18, 1976
40 N.Y.2d 942 (N.Y. 1976)

Summary

In Baskin, DOB granted a variance to a one-family home, allowing the homeowner to install a second kitchen, on a finding that the house met the criteria for a one-family residence despite the possibility that it could later be converted into an illegal two-family home.

Summary of this case from 9th 10th St. LLC v. Bd. of Stds. App. of N.Y.

Opinion

Argued October 20, 1976

Decided November 18, 1976

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, WILLIAM A. WALSH, JR., J.

Kenneth H. Resnick and Andrew R. Stoller for appellants.

Donald J. Ross for intervenors-appellants.

Carl L. Wanderman for respondent.


Order reversed, with costs, petition dismissed and the determination of the zoning board of appeals confirmed on the dissenting memorandum by Mr. Justice J. IRWIN SHAPIRO at the Appellate Division ( 48 A.D.2d 667).

Concur: Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE.


Summaries of

Matter of Baskin v. Zoning Bd. of Apps., Tn. of Ramapo

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Nov 18, 1976
40 N.Y.2d 942 (N.Y. 1976)

In Baskin, DOB granted a variance to a one-family home, allowing the homeowner to install a second kitchen, on a finding that the house met the criteria for a one-family residence despite the possibility that it could later be converted into an illegal two-family home.

Summary of this case from 9th 10th St. LLC v. Bd. of Stds. App. of N.Y.
Case details for

Matter of Baskin v. Zoning Bd. of Apps., Tn. of Ramapo

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of AHARAN BASKIN, Respondent, v. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Nov 18, 1976

Citations

40 N.Y.2d 942 (N.Y. 1976)
390 N.Y.S.2d 412
358 N.E.2d 1037

Citing Cases

9th & 10th Street v. Board of Standards & Appeals

II. 9th 10th Street L.L.C. is entitled as a matter of right to construct the dormitory that is the subject of…

Matter of Ostroff v. Sacks

Judgment affirmed, with costs. We do not believe that the determination in Matter of Baskin v Zoning Bd. of…