From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Master Grp. Glob. Co. v. Toner.com, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Sep 3, 2020
19-CV-06648 (AMD) (RLM) (E.D.N.Y. Sep. 3, 2020)

Summary

awarding costs related to the filing fee

Summary of this case from Sanchez Juarez v. 156-40 Grill LLC

Opinion

19-CV-06648 (AMD) (RLM)

09-03-2020

MASTER GROUP GLOBAL CO., LIMITED, Plaintiff, v. TONER.COM, INC., Defendant.


MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER

ANN M. DONNELLY, United States District Judge:

On November 25, 2019, the plaintiff brought this action against the defendant pursuant to the New York Uniform Commercial Code ("NYUCC"). (ECF No. 1.) The Clerk of the Court issued a certificate of default against the defendant on January 17, 2020. (ECF No. 7.) On March 9, 2020, the plaintiff moved for default judgment. (ECF No. 8.)

Magistrate Judge Roanne L. Mann issued a thorough and well-reasoned Report and Recommendation on August 10, 2020, in which she recommends that the plaintiff's motion be granted in part and denied in part. (ECF No. 19 at 32.) Judge Mann recommends that the plaintiff be awarded compensatory damages in the amount of $506,015.14, along with a daily late fee of .01 percent on this sum to be calculated from December 24, 2018 through the entry of this judgment, and that the plaintiff be awarded post-judgment interest at the federal statutory rate. (Id. at 32-33.) She also recommends that the plaintiff be awarded costs totaling $415.00. (Id. at 33.) However, Judge Mann recommends that the plaintiff not be awarded $1,200 based on the plaintiff's claim regarding a debit note. (Id.) She also recommends that the plaintiff not be awarded attorney's fees or pre-judgment interest. (Id.) Neither party has filed objections to Judge Mann's Report and Recommendation.

A district court "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). To accept those portions of the report and recommendation to which no timely objection has been made, "a district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record." Jarvis v. N. Am. Globex Fund L.P., 823 F. Supp. 2d 161, 163 (E.D.N.Y. 2011) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).

I have reviewed Judge Mann's Report and Recommendation and find no error. Accordingly, I adopt it in its entirety. The plaintiff's motion for default judgment is granted in part and denied in part. The plaintiff is awarded a total of $506,015.14 in damages, late fees calculated in the manner described above, and $415.00 in costs, as well as post-judgment interest. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to enter an award to the plaintiff and to close this case.

While there is contrary authority regarding the plaintiff's ability to recover service costs, see U.S. for Use & Benefit of Evergreen Pipeline Const. Co. v. Merritt Meridian Const. Corp., 95 F.3d 153, 172 (2d Cir. 1996), in light of the de minimis amount of funds at issue ($15) and in the absence of any objection, I adopt Judge Mann's recommendation. --------

SO ORDERED.

s/ Ann M. Donnelly

ANN M. DONNELLY

United States District Judge Dated: Brooklyn, New York

September 3, 2020


Summaries of

Master Grp. Glob. Co. v. Toner.com, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Sep 3, 2020
19-CV-06648 (AMD) (RLM) (E.D.N.Y. Sep. 3, 2020)

awarding costs related to the filing fee

Summary of this case from Sanchez Juarez v. 156-40 Grill LLC
Case details for

Master Grp. Glob. Co. v. Toner.com, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MASTER GROUP GLOBAL CO., LIMITED, Plaintiff, v. TONER.COM, INC., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Sep 3, 2020

Citations

19-CV-06648 (AMD) (RLM) (E.D.N.Y. Sep. 3, 2020)

Citing Cases

Sanchez Juarez v. 156-40 Grill LLC

See Master Grp. Glob. Co., Ltd. v. Toner.Com Inc., No. 19-CV-6648, 2020 WL 5260581, at *15 (E.D.N.Y. Aug.…

Nedspice US Inc. v. Castella Imports, Inc.

However, given that Defendant has defaulted, the Court may proceed. See Master Grp. Glob. Co., Ltd. v.…