From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martin v. Astrue

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Feb 4, 2008
Civil Action No. 8:07-cv-928 (GLS/GHL) (N.D.N.Y. Feb. 4, 2008)

Summary

holding that the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction because the plaintiff filed her complaint only seven days after the ALJ's decision and she therefore did not give the Appeals Council the opportunity to potentially assume jurisdiction

Summary of this case from Hatcher v. Saul

Opinion

Civil Action No. 8:07-cv-928 (GLS/GHL).

February 4, 2008

FOR THE PLAINTIFF:, OFFICE OF MARK A. SCHNEIDER, Plattsburgh, New York, OF COUNSEL:, MARK A. SCHNEIDER, ESQ.

FOR THE DEFENDANT:, HON. GLENN T. SUDDABY, United States Attorney for the Norther District of New York, Syracuse, New York, KAREN T. CALLAHAN, Special Assistant U.S. Attorney.


ORDER


The above-captioned matter comes to this court following a Report-Recommendation by Magistrate Judge George H. Lowe, duly filed on December 27, 2007. Following ten days from the service thereof, the Clerk has sent the file, including any and all objections filed by the parties herein.

No objections having been filed, and the court having reviewed the Magistrate Judge's Report-Recommendation for clear error, it is hereby

ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation of Magistrate Judge George H. Lowe filed December 27, 2007 is ACCEPTED in its entirety for the reasons state therein, and it is further

ORDERED, that the complaint is DISMISSED under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), and it is further

ORDERED, that the clerk enter judgment in favor of the defendant, and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk serve a copy of this order on all parties by regular mail.

IT IS SO ORDERED


Summaries of

Martin v. Astrue

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Feb 4, 2008
Civil Action No. 8:07-cv-928 (GLS/GHL) (N.D.N.Y. Feb. 4, 2008)

holding that the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction because the plaintiff filed her complaint only seven days after the ALJ's decision and she therefore did not give the Appeals Council the opportunity to potentially assume jurisdiction

Summary of this case from Hatcher v. Saul

holding that the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction because the plaintiff filed her complaint only seven days after the ALJ's decision and she therefore did not give the Appeals Council the opportunity to potentially assume jurisdiction

Summary of this case from Judge v. Colvin
Case details for

Martin v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:LISA MARTIN, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. New York

Date published: Feb 4, 2008

Citations

Civil Action No. 8:07-cv-928 (GLS/GHL) (N.D.N.Y. Feb. 4, 2008)

Citing Cases

Judge v. Colvin

Accordingly, there is no "final decision" before the Court, therefore depriving it of subject matter…

Hatcher v. Saul

Judge v. Colvin, No. 12-CV-02633, 2014 WL 4385420, at *2 (E.D.N.Y. Sept. 3, 2014) (Seybert, J.); Perez v.…