From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marshall v. Reisman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Apr 12, 2013
11-CV-5764 (ARR)(VVP) (E.D.N.Y. Apr. 12, 2013)

Summary

reducing rate from $400.00 to $300.00 for experienced attorney with 20 years of experience who ran consumer protection firm for 12 years, and reducing rate from $200.00 to $150.00 for associate who had two years of consumer protection experience

Summary of this case from Frederic v. Commonwealth Fin. Sys., Inc.

Opinion

11-CV-5764 (ARR)(VVP)

04-12-2013

JOSEPH MARSHALL and CORA MARSHALL, Plaintiffs, v. DENNIS MARC REISMAN, DANIEL GOLDBERG, GIBRALTER HOME IMPROVEMENTS, INC., GIBRALTER CONSTRUCTION, INC., and VIP CONSTRUCTION, INC., Defendants.


NOT FOR ELECTRONIC

OR PRINT PUBLICATION


ORDER

ROSS, United States District Judge:

The court has received the Report and Recommendation on the instant case dated March 25, 2013, from the Honorable Viktor V. Pohorelsky, United States Magistrate Judge, No objections have been filed. Accordingly, the court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation for clear error on the face of the record. See Advisory Comm. Notes to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); accord Brissett v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Auth., No. 09-CV-1930682 (CBA) (LB), 2011 WL 1930682, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. May 19, 2011). Having reviewed the record, I find no clear error. I hereby adopt the Report and Recommendation, in its entirety, as the opinion of the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). I therefore grant in part and deny in part plaintiff's motion for attorney's fees and costs, and award counsel with an overall recovery of $12,855 in attorney's fees and $350 in costs.

SO ORDERED. Dated: April 12, 2013

Brooklyn, New York

____________________________

Allyne R. Ross

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Marshall v. Reisman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Apr 12, 2013
11-CV-5764 (ARR)(VVP) (E.D.N.Y. Apr. 12, 2013)

reducing rate from $400.00 to $300.00 for experienced attorney with 20 years of experience who ran consumer protection firm for 12 years, and reducing rate from $200.00 to $150.00 for associate who had two years of consumer protection experience

Summary of this case from Frederic v. Commonwealth Fin. Sys., Inc.
Case details for

Marshall v. Reisman

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH MARSHALL and CORA MARSHALL, Plaintiffs, v. DENNIS MARC REISMAN…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Apr 12, 2013

Citations

11-CV-5764 (ARR)(VVP) (E.D.N.Y. Apr. 12, 2013)

Citing Cases

Tri-Messine Constr. Corp. v. Pavers & Rd. Builders Dist. Council Pension Fund & Its Trs.

"A district court is not, however, required to set forth item-by-item findings concerning what may be…

McMahon-Pitts v. Sokoloff

50 is consistent with, or lower than, fees awarded in other FDCPA cases in the Second Circuit, and,…