From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marsh v. Arthur H. Lee Sons, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 15, 1970
34 A.D.2d 985 (N.Y. App. Div. 1970)

Summary

In Marsh (supra) the Supreme Court, Queens County, on motion, struck out defendant's answer because of his failure to execute his examination before trial.

Summary of this case from Merck, Sharp Dohme v. Whitted

Opinion

June 15, 1970


In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, the appeal, as limited by appellant's brief, is from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated December 16, 1969, as, on reargument, adhered to the original decision striking out appellant's answer to the complaint because of appellant's failure to execute a transcript of its examination before trial, etc. Order reversed insofar as appealed from and respondent's motion to strike out appellant's answer denied, on condition that appellant pay respondent $10 costs and disbursements of this appeal, which are hereby awarded, within 10 days after service of a copy of the order hereon with notice of entry. In our opinion, it was an improvident exercise of discretion to strike appellant's answer, since the requested material was furnished prior to the hearing of the motion. Rabin, Acting P.J., Hopkins, Martuscello, Latham and Brennan, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Marsh v. Arthur H. Lee Sons, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 15, 1970
34 A.D.2d 985 (N.Y. App. Div. 1970)

In Marsh (supra) the Supreme Court, Queens County, on motion, struck out defendant's answer because of his failure to execute his examination before trial.

Summary of this case from Merck, Sharp Dohme v. Whitted
Case details for

Marsh v. Arthur H. Lee Sons, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:LEONARD MARSH, Respondent, v. ARTHUR H. LEE SONS, INC., Defendant, and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 15, 1970

Citations

34 A.D.2d 985 (N.Y. App. Div. 1970)

Citing Cases

Ungar v. Lesser

Upon examination of the record and consideration of the conduct of counsel for defendant Barry D. Lesser, who…

Merck, Sharp Dohme v. Whitted

This court has had occasion in the past to hold that a motion to strike an answer is not, in its opinion, the…