From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marcus v. Manhattan Beach Parks Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 24, 1936
246 App. Div. 331 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)

Summary

In Marcus v Manhattan Beach Parks Corp (246 App. Div. 331) the First Department reversed a judgment which had dismissed the complaint at the end of plaintiff's case.

Summary of this case from Batton v. Elghanayan

Opinion

January 24, 1936.

Appeal from Supreme Court of New York County.

Benjamin Cohen of counsel [ Herman S. Stern, attorney], for the appellant.

Edward A. Harmon of counsel [ William E. Lowther, attorney], for the respondent.

Present — MARTIN, P.J., TOWNLEY, GLENNON, UNTERMYER and DORE, JJ.; MARTIN, P.J., and DORE, J., dissent and vote for affirmance.


From the plaintiff's proof and the photographs in evidence, the jury could have found that the defect which caused the plaintiff's fall was the result of gradual wear or deterioration and that consequently the defendant was chargeable with constructive notice of the condition.

The judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.


Judgment dismissing the complaint at the close of plaintiff's case reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.


Summaries of

Marcus v. Manhattan Beach Parks Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 24, 1936
246 App. Div. 331 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)

In Marcus v Manhattan Beach Parks Corp (246 App. Div. 331) the First Department reversed a judgment which had dismissed the complaint at the end of plaintiff's case.

Summary of this case from Batton v. Elghanayan
Case details for

Marcus v. Manhattan Beach Parks Corp.

Case Details

Full title:BEATRICE LEE MARCUS, Appellant, v. MANHATTAN BEACH PARKS CORP., Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 24, 1936

Citations

246 App. Div. 331 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)
284 N.Y.S. 952

Citing Cases

Valle v. City of New York

Similarly, there appear to be no out-of-State decisions on the subject. In New York, there are three cases,…

Shapiro v. Hotel Corporation of America

The expert's opinion is too speculative. (Cf. Marcus v. Manhattan Beach Parks Corp., 246 App. Div. 331, 332,…