From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MAR v. CITY OF McKEESPORT

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Sep 20, 2007
2:05-cv-19 (W.D. Pa. Sep. 20, 2007)

Summary

holding that temporal proximity of three months was insufficient to establish causation

Summary of this case from Jamison v. Wetzel

Opinion

2:05-cv-19.

September 20, 2007


ORDER OF COURT


AND NOW, this 20th day of September, 2007, after the plaintiffs filed a second amended complaint in the above-captioned case, and after the defendants submitted a supplemental motion for summary judgment on Count IX, and after a Report and Recommendation was issued by the United States Magistrate Judge, and the parties were granted thirteen days after being served with a copy to file written objections thereto, and no objections having been filed, and after independent review of the pleadings, and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, which is adopted as the opinion of this Court,

IT IS ORDERED that the defendants' supplemental motion for summary judgment on Count IX of the second amended complaint (Document No. 80) is granted.


Summaries of

MAR v. CITY OF McKEESPORT

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Sep 20, 2007
2:05-cv-19 (W.D. Pa. Sep. 20, 2007)

holding that temporal proximity of three months was insufficient to establish causation

Summary of this case from Jamison v. Wetzel

holding that temporal proximity of three months was insufficient to establish causation

Summary of this case from Fischer v. Transue

holding that temporal proximity of three months was insufficient to establish causation

Summary of this case from Hoffman v. Dougher
Case details for

MAR v. CITY OF McKEESPORT

Case Details

Full title:DARRELL J. MAR, SR., Individually And DARRELL J. MAR, SR. as Parent and…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Sep 20, 2007

Citations

2:05-cv-19 (W.D. Pa. Sep. 20, 2007)

Citing Cases

Young v. Walters

The lapse of time between those two incidents is far too great to support an inference of retaliatory motive.…

Thomas v. Oliver

” Victor, 2012 WL 2564892, at *9. See also Thomas v. Town of Hammonton, 351 F.3d 108, 114 (3d Cir. 2003)…