In Mangini, the court applied the Sperry test to find that RJR's targeting of youth through the Old Joe Camel cartoon character constituted an unfair business practice under the UCL.
Summary of this case from Colgate v. Juul Labs, Inc.See 7 Cal.4th 1057 for Supreme Court opinion.
In Mangini, the court applied the Sperry test to find that RJR's targeting of youth through the Old Joe Camel cartoon character constituted an unfair business practice under the UCL.
Summary of this case from Colgate v. Juul Labs, Inc.Full title:JANET C. MANGINI, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO…
Court:California Court of Appeals, First District, Fifth Division
Date published: Jul 14, 1993
REVIEW GRANTED Reprinted without change in 22 Cal.App.4th 628, to permit tracking pending review by the…
Colgate v. Juul Labs, Inc.Id. Plaintiffs rely heavily on Mangini v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. , 21 Cal. Rptr. 2d 232, 242 (Cal. Ct.…