holding that where plaintiffs "present[ed] no evidence that the securities . . . were part of a public offering, their argument regarding fraudulent concealment is irrelevant"
Summary of this case from Tanner v. JohnstonNo. 95-3406.
October 9, 1996.
D.Kan.
AFFIRMED IN PART, RE-VERSED IN PART
holding that where plaintiffs "present[ed] no evidence that the securities . . . were part of a public offering, their argument regarding fraudulent concealment is irrelevant"
Summary of this case from Tanner v. Johnstonconcluding that where the claimant testified that he discontinued treatment for financial reasons, there was not substantial evidence to support the conclusion that he could perform sedentary work
Summary of this case from Smith v. Colvinnaming committee acting as Administrator and named Fiduciary of the Retirement Plan and also noting that the plaintiff did not contest the use of the arbitrary and capricious standard
Summary of this case from Anderson v. Altius Health Plans, Inc.indicating that mental impairments should be considered in framing hypothetical questions to a VE
Summary of this case from Cordova v. Barnhartobserving that Sandin may apply to pretrial detainee complaints concerning procedural imperfections in disciplinary hearing, but not deciding the point, concluding that the detainee had sufficient procedure because plaintiff was able to call witnesses and present evidence
Summary of this case from Rodriguez v. Penobscot County JailFull title:Macklin v. Retirement Plan for Employees of Kansas Gas Elec. Co
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Date published: Oct 9, 1996
Instead, we perceive that the Tenth Circuit has keenly avoided making the determination as to the newly…
Williams v. HullAs to the first requirement, "prison conditions violate the Eighth Amendment if they result in the…