In Sugarloaf, despite the lack of a statute conditioning standing to participate in the contested case hearing upon aggrievement, the ALJ made factual findings that the protestants were not aggrieved within the meaning of Bryniarski v. Montgomery Co., 247 Md. 137, 230 A.2d 289 (1967) and other cases.
Summary of this case from Holland v. Woodhaven BldgSeptember Term 1995
Decided July 19, 1995
Pet. Docket No. 65 — granted.
In Sugarloaf, despite the lack of a statute conditioning standing to participate in the contested case hearing upon aggrievement, the ALJ made factual findings that the protestants were not aggrieved within the meaning of Bryniarski v. Montgomery Co., 247 Md. 137, 230 A.2d 289 (1967) and other cases.
Summary of this case from Holland v. Woodhaven BldgFull title:FLOYD JACKSON BAILEY v. STATE
Court:Court of Appeals of Maryland
Date published: Jul 19, 1995
That court concluded that Flansburg had a right to the effective assistance of counsel at his probation…
State v. EastmanPoe) with a shotgun, the Court of Special Appeals of Maryland followed established case precedent and held…