From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lowe v. Hamilton County Dept. of Job Fam SVC

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Mar 26, 2008
Case Number: 1:05cv117 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 26, 2008)

Summary

finding that Hamilton County is not sui juris and suit must therefore be brought against its commissioners for the county's violation of an individual's rights

Summary of this case from Phillips v. City of Cincinnati

Opinion

Case Number: 1:05cv117.

March 26, 2008


ORDER


The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Timothy S. Black filed on February 29, 2008 (Doc. 86), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b) expired March 20, 2008, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.

Accordingly, Plaintiff's request to amend the complaint to properly name the Hamilton County and The Board of County Commissioners as Defendants is GRANTED.

Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Hamilton County Department of Jobs and Family Services as a party (Doc. 77) is GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Lowe v. Hamilton County Dept. of Job Fam SVC

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Mar 26, 2008
Case Number: 1:05cv117 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 26, 2008)

finding that Hamilton County is not sui juris and suit must therefore be brought against its commissioners for the county's violation of an individual's rights

Summary of this case from Phillips v. City of Cincinnati

adopting report and recommendation finding that neither Hamilton County nor HCJFS to be sui juris

Summary of this case from Baird v. Hamilton Cnty. Dep't of Job & Family Servs.
Case details for

Lowe v. Hamilton County Dept. of Job Fam SVC

Case Details

Full title:UNEEK LOWE, Plaintiff(s), v. HAMILTON COUNTY DEPARTMENT of JOB AND FAMILY…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division

Date published: Mar 26, 2008

Citations

Case Number: 1:05cv117 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 26, 2008)

Citing Cases

Walker v. Joyce

Further, upon review, the undersigned finds that Plaintiff has not named the proper entity because MCCS is…

Printup v. Dungey

Assuming for the moment that Butler County is not a proper party in the case, it is a defect in the pleadings…