From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Love v. Garrison-Barrett Group

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
Jun 13, 1997
720 So. 2d 1065 (Ala. Civ. App. 1997)

Summary

In Garrison v. Barrett, 176 N.Y.S. 19, it was held that to carry into effect said rule 9 the entry of an order is necessary, and that rule 33 of the Municipal Court requires that where both parties have appeared by attorneys copies of all papers which are required to be filed with the clerk shall be served upon the attorney for the adverse party, with notice of filing, within one day of the date of such filing.

Summary of this case from Stoneware Electric Stove Works v. Barrett

Opinion

No. 2960376.

May 2, 1997. June 13, 1997.


Decisions of the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals Without Opinions Case reinstated Transferred to Sup. Ct. Affirmed.


Summaries of

Love v. Garrison-Barrett Group

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
Jun 13, 1997
720 So. 2d 1065 (Ala. Civ. App. 1997)

In Garrison v. Barrett, 176 N.Y.S. 19, it was held that to carry into effect said rule 9 the entry of an order is necessary, and that rule 33 of the Municipal Court requires that where both parties have appeared by attorneys copies of all papers which are required to be filed with the clerk shall be served upon the attorney for the adverse party, with notice of filing, within one day of the date of such filing.

Summary of this case from Stoneware Electric Stove Works v. Barrett
Case details for

Love v. Garrison-Barrett Group

Case Details

Full title:Michael Love and Stacia Love v. Garrison-Barrett Group, Inc

Court:Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Jun 13, 1997

Citations

720 So. 2d 1065 (Ala. Civ. App. 1997)

Citing Cases

Stoneware Electric Stove Works v. Barrett

Causes marked "reserved generally" are restored to the trial calendar of the Municipal Court by virtue of…

Stoneware El. Stove Works v. Barrett

Plaintiff then obtained an order in the City Court for the examination in supplementary proceedings of the…