From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lottotron, Inc. v. Telepublicidad

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Nov 14, 2013
Civil Action No. 10-337 (SRC) (D.N.J. Nov. 14, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 10-337 (SRC)

11-14-2013

LOTTOTRON, INC., Plaintiff, v. TELEPUBLICIDAD, S.A., et al. Defendants.


ORDER

CHESLER, U.S.D.J.

This matter having come before the Court upon the motion by Plaintiff Lottotron, Inc. for default judgment against Defendants Defendants Virtual Casino Group, Jeux Virtuels, S.A., Dulce Vida De Las Americas, S.A., Azul Electrico, S.A., Ala Data Management, S.A., and Telepublicidad, S.A., pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 55(b)(2); and

IT APPEARING that the Court Ordered on August 8, 2011, that the motion for default judgment be granted, and that this matter be referred to the magistrate judge for an evidentiary hearing to establish the amount of damages, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); and it further

APPEARING that on September 16, 2013, Magistrate Judge Cathy L. Waldor issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") on this matter, pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b), L. CIV. R. 72.1(a)(2), and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); and it further

APPEARING that, within 10 days of service of the magistrate judge's recommended disposition, any party to the action may file specific objections, stated in writing, to the magistrate judge's proposed findings and recommendations; and it further

APPEARING that a district judge must conduct a de novo review of those portions of the magistrate judge's R&R to which objection is made; and it further

Id.
--------

APPEARING that the time for filing objections to the R&R has expired, and no objections to the R&R have been filed; and it further

APPEARING that this Court has reviewed the R&R and accepts and agrees with the findings and recommendations of the R&R in whole; and good cause appearing,

IT IS, THEREFORE, on this 14th day of November, 2013,

ORDERED that the September 16, 2013 R&R [docket entry no. 57] is ADOPTED as the Opinion of the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b)(2), Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Plaintiffs and against Defendants as follows:

1. VCG - $4,032,000;
2. Jeux Virtuels - $1,848,000;
3. Ala - $4,032,000;
4. Dulce Vida - $3,024,000;
5. Azul - $4,032,000; and
6. Telepublicidad - $4,032,000.

________________

Stanley R. Chesler

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Lottotron, Inc. v. Telepublicidad

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Nov 14, 2013
Civil Action No. 10-337 (SRC) (D.N.J. Nov. 14, 2013)
Case details for

Lottotron, Inc. v. Telepublicidad

Case Details

Full title:LOTTOTRON, INC., Plaintiff, v. TELEPUBLICIDAD, S.A., et al. Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Date published: Nov 14, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No. 10-337 (SRC) (D.N.J. Nov. 14, 2013)