From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lopresti v. Massachusetts Mut. Life Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of the State of New York, Kings County
Oct 19, 2004
5 Misc. 3d 1006 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2004)

Summary

In Lopresti v Massachusetts Mut. Life Ins. Co. (5 Misc 3d 1006[A], 2004 NY Slip Op 51223[U] [2004], affd 30 AD3d 474 [2d Dept 2006]), the Supreme Court rejected the plaintiff annuity insurance salesman's claim that the defendants' determination to disallow their employees' participation in retirement plans run by certain insurers, including the plaintiff, violated the Donnelly Act.

Summary of this case from Benjamin v. Austin

Opinion

October 19, 2004.


Monopolies — Donnelly Act. General Business Law — § 340 (Contracts or agreements for monopoly or in restraint of trade illegal and void).


Summaries of

Lopresti v. Massachusetts Mut. Life Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of the State of New York, Kings County
Oct 19, 2004
5 Misc. 3d 1006 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2004)

In Lopresti v Massachusetts Mut. Life Ins. Co. (5 Misc 3d 1006[A], 2004 NY Slip Op 51223[U] [2004], affd 30 AD3d 474 [2d Dept 2006]), the Supreme Court rejected the plaintiff annuity insurance salesman's claim that the defendants' determination to disallow their employees' participation in retirement plans run by certain insurers, including the plaintiff, violated the Donnelly Act.

Summary of this case from Benjamin v. Austin
Case details for

Lopresti v. Massachusetts Mut. Life Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:LOPRESTI v. MASSACHUSETTS MUT. LIFE INS. CO

Court:Supreme Court of the State of New York, Kings County

Date published: Oct 19, 2004

Citations

5 Misc. 3d 1006 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2004)
2004 N.Y. Slip Op. 51223

Citing Cases

Quality Health Mgmt., Inc. v. Healthfirst PHSP, Inc.

Id. It is for these reasons, defendant maintains, that plaintiff's claim under the Donnelly Act should be…

Isaac v. Med. Liab. Mut. Ins. Co.

The Fourth Department has recognized that "the statutory term 'arrangement,' like the statutory terms…