From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lopez v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
May 18, 2015
No. 66434 (Nev. May. 18, 2015)

Opinion

No. 66434

05-18-2015

GREGORY JOHN LOPEZ, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.


An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.

ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

This is a pro se appeal from an order of the district court denying a motion to modify a sentence. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Kathleen E. Delaney, Judge.

This appeal has been submitted for decision without oral argument, NRAP 34(f)(3), and we conclude that the record is sufficient for our review and briefing is unwarranted. See Luckett v. Warden, 91 Nev. 681, 682, 541 P.2d 910, 911 (1975).

In his motion filed on July 17, 2014, appellant Gregory John Lopez claimed that he should have received only one deadly weapon enhancement rather than two. Lopez failed to demonstrate that his sentence was based on mistaken assumptions about his criminal record that worked to his extreme detriment. See Edwards v. State, 112 Nev. 704, 708, 918 P.2d 321, 324 (1996). Therefore, without considering the merits of the claim raised in the motion, we conclude that the district court did not err in denying the motion. Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

/s/_________, J.

Parraguirre

/s/_________, J.

Douglas

/s/_________, J.

Cherry
cc: Hon. Kathleen E. Delaney, District Judge

Gregory John Lopez

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

Eighth District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Lopez v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
May 18, 2015
No. 66434 (Nev. May. 18, 2015)
Case details for

Lopez v. State

Case Details

Full title:GREGORY JOHN LOPEZ, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: May 18, 2015

Citations

No. 66434 (Nev. May. 18, 2015)