From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Loeschigk v. Hatfield

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 1, 1873
51 N.Y. 660 (N.Y. 1873)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

In Loeschigk v. Hatfield (5 Robt. 26), it was held that a surviving partner could transfer the whole assets of the firm to a firm creditor in payment of his debt, without the assent of the representatives of the deceased partner, provided it was done in good faith, and that such transfer could not, in the absence of fraud, be disturbed by other creditors of the firm.

Summary of this case from Williams et al. v. Whedon
See 1 Summary

Opinion

Argued October 4, 1872

Decided January term, 1873

William Watson for the appellants.

A.R. Dyett for the respondents.

HUNT, C., reads for affirmance.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.

Summaries of

Loeschigk v. Hatfield

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 1, 1873
51 N.Y. 660 (N.Y. 1873)

In Loeschigk v. Hatfield (5 Robt. 26), it was held that a surviving partner could transfer the whole assets of the firm to a firm creditor in payment of his debt, without the assent of the representatives of the deceased partner, provided it was done in good faith, and that such transfer could not, in the absence of fraud, be disturbed by other creditors of the firm.

Summary of this case from Williams et al. v. Whedon
Case details for

Loeschigk v. Hatfield

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM LOESCHIGK et al., Appellants, v . AMOS F. HATFIELD et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jan 1, 1873

Citations

51 N.Y. 660 (N.Y. 1873)

Citing Cases

Commercial Bank v. Bolton

e opinion that as to her the decision made by the trial judge should be sustained. We come now to the…

Williams et al. v. Whedon

As we have before seen, if the firm is insolvent neither the assent of the representatives, nor the statute…

7 Citing Cases