Summary
In Loeschigk v. Hatfield (5 Robt. 26), it was held that a surviving partner could transfer the whole assets of the firm to a firm creditor in payment of his debt, without the assent of the representatives of the deceased partner, provided it was done in good faith, and that such transfer could not, in the absence of fraud, be disturbed by other creditors of the firm.
Summary of this case from Williams et al. v. WhedonOpinion
Argued October 4, 1872
Decided January term, 1873
William Watson for the appellants.
A.R. Dyett for the respondents.
HUNT, C., reads for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.