Summary
concluding that this Court "would have lacked jurisdiction to consider" the substance of an untimely motion for reargument
Summary of this case from Mikkilineni v. Paypal, Inc.Opinion
No. 381, 2016
10-17-2016
DISMISSED.
concluding that this Court "would have lacked jurisdiction to consider" the substance of an untimely motion for reargument
Summary of this case from Mikkilineni v. Paypal, Inc.No. 381, 2016
10-17-2016
DISMISSED.
concluding that this Court "would have lacked jurisdiction to consider" the substance of an untimely motion for reargument
Summary of this case from Mikkilineni v. Paypal, Inc.concluding that this Court "would have lacked jurisdiction to consider" the substance of an untimely motion for reargument
Summary of this case from Mikkilineni v. PayPal, Inc.concluding that this Court "would have lacked jurisdiction to consider" the substance of an untimely motion for reargument
Summary of this case from Mikkilineni v. PayPal, Inc.Full title:Edward Lewis, Plaintiff Below, Appellant, v. Robert Coupe, Commissioner…
Court:Supreme Court of Delaware.
Date published: Oct 17, 2016
See Hessler, Inc. v. Farrell, 260 A.2d 701, 701 n.1 (Del. 1969) (Under Civil Rule 6(b), this Court "has…
Mikkilineni v. Paypal, Inc.Super. Ct. Civ. R. 59(e).Lewis v. Coupe, 2016 WL 6081825, at *1 (Del. Oct. 17, 2016) (concluding that this…