From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lewis v. Coupe

Supreme Court of Delaware.
Oct 17, 2016
149 A.3d 1020 (Del. 2016)

Summary

concluding that this Court "would have lacked jurisdiction to consider" the substance of an untimely motion for reargument

Summary of this case from Mikkilineni v. Paypal, Inc.

Opinion

No. 381, 2016

10-17-2016

Edward Lewis, Plaintiff Below, Appellant, v. Robert Coupe, Commissioner, Department of Correction and David Pierce, Warden, James T. Vaughn Correctional Center, Defendants Below, Appellee.


DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Lewis v. Coupe

Supreme Court of Delaware.
Oct 17, 2016
149 A.3d 1020 (Del. 2016)

concluding that this Court "would have lacked jurisdiction to consider" the substance of an untimely motion for reargument

Summary of this case from Mikkilineni v. Paypal, Inc.

concluding that this Court "would have lacked jurisdiction to consider" the substance of an untimely motion for reargument

Summary of this case from Mikkilineni v. PayPal, Inc.

concluding that this Court "would have lacked jurisdiction to consider" the substance of an untimely motion for reargument

Summary of this case from Mikkilineni v. PayPal, Inc.
Case details for

Lewis v. Coupe

Case Details

Full title:Edward Lewis, Plaintiff Below, Appellant, v. Robert Coupe, Commissioner…

Court:Supreme Court of Delaware.

Date published: Oct 17, 2016

Citations

149 A.3d 1020 (Del. 2016)

Citing Cases

Mikkilineni v. PayPal, Inc.

See Hessler, Inc. v. Farrell, 260 A.2d 701, 701 n.1 (Del. 1969) (Under Civil Rule 6(b), this Court "has…

Mikkilineni v. Paypal, Inc.

Super. Ct. Civ. R. 59(e).Lewis v. Coupe, 2016 WL 6081825, at *1 (Del. Oct. 17, 2016) (concluding that this…