From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Levinthal v. Chicago Transit Authority

Appellate Court of Illinois
Nov 27, 1951
345 Ill. App. 185 (Ill. App. Ct. 1951)

Summary

In Levinthal v. Chicago Transit Authority, 345 Ill. App. 185, 102 N.E.2d 545 (Abst Opin) plaintiff included in a similar instruction which listed items of damages, "loss of earnings, if any, proximately resulting from said injuries.

Summary of this case from Alvarez v. Reynolds

Opinion

Gen. No. 45,422. (Abstract of Decision.)

Opinion filed November 27, 1951 Released for publication January 3, 1952

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. STANLEY H. KLARKOWSKI, Judge, presiding. Judgment reversed and cause remanded. Heard in the second division, first district, this court at the April term, 1951.

Werner W. Schroeder, James O. Dwight, Warner H. Robinson, Arthur J. Donovan, and Thomas C. Strachan, Jr., for appellant;

David L. Leeds, for appellee;

Thomas H. Ramsey, and Albert Green, of counsel.


Not to be published in full. Opinion filed November 27, 1951; released for publication January 3, 1952.


Summaries of

Levinthal v. Chicago Transit Authority

Appellate Court of Illinois
Nov 27, 1951
345 Ill. App. 185 (Ill. App. Ct. 1951)

In Levinthal v. Chicago Transit Authority, 345 Ill. App. 185, 102 N.E.2d 545 (Abst Opin) plaintiff included in a similar instruction which listed items of damages, "loss of earnings, if any, proximately resulting from said injuries.

Summary of this case from Alvarez v. Reynolds
Case details for

Levinthal v. Chicago Transit Authority

Case Details

Full title:Frank Levinthal, Appellee, v. Chicago Transit Authority, Appellant

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois

Date published: Nov 27, 1951

Citations

345 Ill. App. 185 (Ill. App. Ct. 1951)
102 N.E.2d 545

Citing Cases

Hays v. Pennsylvania R. Co.

The judgment was not excessive, but we felt compelled to reverse it because we could not say whether the jury…

Goad v. Evans

Reductions of damage awards to account for probable future child-rearing expenses must be based on evidence…