In Layton v. Dennis, 43 N.J.L. 380, it was merely held that the affidavit was not sufficiently certain, as it failed to state the amount due the landlord, c.
Summary of this case from Compton v. ComptonMay 5, 1943.
Present — Crosby, P.J., Cunningham, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ.
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. All concur. (The order denies defendant's motion to dismiss plaintiff's complaint for failure to prosecute.)
In Layton v. Dennis, 43 N.J.L. 380, it was merely held that the affidavit was not sufficiently certain, as it failed to state the amount due the landlord, c.
Summary of this case from Compton v. ComptonFull title:ORA D. LAYTON, as Administratrix of the Estate of LURA A. DENNIS…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Date published: May 5, 1943
And if the affidavit is insufficient, jurisdiction is lacking. Layton v. Dennis, 43 N.J.L. 380; Hilyard v.…
Compton v. ComptonWest v. Wilson, supra, is clearly inapplicable. It treats of notice of demand for possession. In Layton v.…