From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lankster v. City of Linden, Ala.

United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Northern Division
Jul 27, 2009
Civil Action No. 09-00250-CG-N (S.D. Ala. Jul. 27, 2009)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 09-00250-CG-N.

July 27, 2009


ORDER


After due and proper consideration of all pleadings in this file, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objection is made, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) is adopted as the opinion of this Court.

The court notes that although the court directed any objection filed by plaintiff to specifically address the jurisdictional principles discussed in the Report and Recommendation, the plaintiff failed to do so.

It is ORDERED that this action be dismissed with prejudice, prior to service of process, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(I) as frivolous.

DONE and ORDERED.


Summaries of

Lankster v. City of Linden, Ala.

United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Northern Division
Jul 27, 2009
Civil Action No. 09-00250-CG-N (S.D. Ala. Jul. 27, 2009)
Case details for

Lankster v. City of Linden, Ala.

Case Details

Full title:ALBERT F. LANKSTER, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF LINDEN, ALA. Defendant

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Northern Division

Date published: Jul 27, 2009

Citations

Civil Action No. 09-00250-CG-N (S.D. Ala. Jul. 27, 2009)

Citing Cases

Yates v. Mack

(“We have consistently refused to hold municipalities liable under a theory of respondeat superior.”); see,…