Summary
In Langton v. Marshall, 59 Texas 296[ 59 Tex. 296], a certificate stating that the feme declared that she "fully understood the contents" of the deed was held to be an insufficient compliance with a statute requiring from the feme a declaration that "the said writing to be shown and explained to her" was her free act, and giving the form of a certificate in which compliance is stated in the words, "having the same fully explained to her."
Summary of this case from Paine v. BakerOpinion
February 24, 1995.
Present: LoConto, P.J., Teahan Merrigan, JJ.
Damages, For alleged noncompliance with permanent injunction. Practice, Civil, Dist./Mun. Cts. R Civ. P., Rule 64 (c).
Report of court's dismissal of plaintiff's appeal. Action dismissed in the Gardner Division by Hillman, J.
This matter arises out of a civil entry in the District Court of Gardner on June 15, 1994 seeking damages on a daily and escalating basis for alleged noncompliance with a U.S. District Court permanent injunction. Prior to responsive pleadings the Court, sua sponte, dismissed the action for lack of jurisdiction.
The new Dist./Mun. Cts. Rules for Appellate Division Appeal are not applicable. They apply to cases entered as of July 1, 1994. The plaintiff has failed to comply with Dist./Mun. Cts. R. Civ. P., Rule 64 (c).
There is no report before us. We are unable to reach any issues raised.
The appeal is dismissed.