Summary
finding substantial evidence did not support the ALJ's RFC determination where the ALJ rejected all medical opinions in the record that might explain the effects of the claimant's physical impairments on his ability to perform work and where there were no such opinions as to claimant's mental impairments
Summary of this case from Jim S. v. SaulOpinion
CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:12-CV-792-Y
11-22-2013
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION
On November 5, 2013, the United States magistrate judge issued his findings, conclusions, and recommendation ("the findings") in this case. In the findings, the magistrate judge recommended that the Court reverse and remand the decision of the commissioner of the Social Security Administration denying Plaintiff's claims for disability insurance benefits under Title II and supplemental security income under Title XVI of the Social Security Act. An order issued that same day gave all parties until November 19 to serve and file with the Court written objections to the findings. Neither party has filed objections.
After review, the Court concludes that the findings should be, and are hereby, ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of this Court for the reasons stated therein. Accordingly, the commissioner's decision is REVERSED and REMANDED for further administrative proceedings consistent with the findings.
_______________
TERRY R. MEANS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE