From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lagrone v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION
Nov 22, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:12-CV-792-Y (N.D. Tex. Nov. 22, 2013)

Summary

finding substantial evidence did not support the ALJ's RFC determination where the ALJ rejected all medical opinions in the record that might explain the effects of the claimant's physical impairments on his ability to perform work and where there were no such opinions as to claimant's mental impairments

Summary of this case from Jim S. v. Saul

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:12-CV-792-Y

11-22-2013

LEE LAGRONE v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S

FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION

On November 5, 2013, the United States magistrate judge issued his findings, conclusions, and recommendation ("the findings") in this case. In the findings, the magistrate judge recommended that the Court reverse and remand the decision of the commissioner of the Social Security Administration denying Plaintiff's claims for disability insurance benefits under Title II and supplemental security income under Title XVI of the Social Security Act. An order issued that same day gave all parties until November 19 to serve and file with the Court written objections to the findings. Neither party has filed objections.

After review, the Court concludes that the findings should be, and are hereby, ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of this Court for the reasons stated therein. Accordingly, the commissioner's decision is REVERSED and REMANDED for further administrative proceedings consistent with the findings.

_______________

TERRY R. MEANS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Lagrone v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION
Nov 22, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:12-CV-792-Y (N.D. Tex. Nov. 22, 2013)

finding substantial evidence did not support the ALJ's RFC determination where the ALJ rejected all medical opinions in the record that might explain the effects of the claimant's physical impairments on his ability to perform work and where there were no such opinions as to claimant's mental impairments

Summary of this case from Jim S. v. Saul

finding substantial evidence did not support the ALJ's RFC determination where the ALJ rejected all medical opinions in the record that might explain the effects of the claimant's physical impairments on his ability to perform work and where there were no such opinions as to claimant's mental impairments

Summary of this case from Darrion B. v. Berryhill

finding substantial evidence did not support the ALJ's RFC determination where the ALJ rejected all medical opinions in the record that might explain the effects of the claimant's physical impairments on his ability to perform work and where there were no such opinions as to claimant's mental impairments

Summary of this case from Erica W. v. Berryhill

finding substantial evidence did not support the ALJ's RFC determination where the ALJ rejected all medical opinions in the record that might explain the effects of the claimant's physical impairments on his ability to perform work and where there were no such opinions as to claimant's mental impairments

Summary of this case from Angela C. v. Berryhill

finding substantial evidence did not support the ALJ's RFC determination where the ALJ rejected all medical opinions in the record that might explain the effects of the claimant's physical impairments on his ability to perform work and there were no such opinions as to claimant's mental impairments

Summary of this case from Johns v. Colvin
Case details for

Lagrone v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:LEE LAGRONE v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION

Date published: Nov 22, 2013

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:12-CV-792-Y (N.D. Tex. Nov. 22, 2013)

Citing Cases

Erica W. v. Berryhill

Consequently, substantial evidence does not support the mental aspect of the ALJ's RFC determination. See…

Soaper v. Comm'r, Soc. Sec. Admin.

N.D. Tex. Jan. 28, 2014) (finding because the ALJ rejected the only medical opinion in the record that he had…