From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kramer v. Castaneda

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Apr 3, 2015
599 F. App'x 174 (5th Cir. 2015)

Summary

construing notice of appeal with reasons for untimely filing as Fed. R. App. P. 4 motion

Summary of this case from Glenn v. Davis

Opinion

No. 14-50472

04-03-2015

ROBERT KRAMER, Plaintiff-Appellant v. CORRECTIONAL OFFICER A. CASTANEDA; RUBEN SANCHEZ, John Doe #1; IMER COLLINS, Jane Doe #1-Property Officer; C. LAWSON, Regional Grievance; GORGE MOTA, John Doe #2, Defendants-Appellees


Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 4:13-CV-20
Before PRADO, OWEN, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Robert Kramer, Texas prisoner # 643733, appeals the dismissal of his civil action. He also moves for the appointment of counsel and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal.

After entry of the judgment dismissing his action, Kramer had 30 days to file a timely notice of appeal. See FED. R. APP. P. 4(a)(1)(A). His May 6, 2014, pro se notice of appeal was untimely. See id.; Spotville v. Cain, 149 F.3d 374, 376-78 (5th Cir. 1998). The timing of Kramer's notice of appeal raises a jurisdictional question that this court must examine on its own motion, if necessary. See Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007); Mosley v. Cozby, 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th Cir. 1987).

A district court may extend the 30-day filing period of Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(1)(A) upon a showing of excusable neglect or good cause. See FED. R. APP. P. 4(a)(5)(A). We construe Kramer's notice of appeal, which asserted reasons for his untimely filing, as a motion under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(5)(A). The case is REMANDED to permit the district court to make a ruling under Rule 4(a)(5). While the case is on this limited remand, Kramer's appeal and motions are held in abeyance. Upon ruling, the district court shall return the case to this court for dismissal or further proceedings, as may be appropriate.


Summaries of

Kramer v. Castaneda

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Apr 3, 2015
599 F. App'x 174 (5th Cir. 2015)

construing notice of appeal with reasons for untimely filing as Fed. R. App. P. 4 motion

Summary of this case from Glenn v. Davis
Case details for

Kramer v. Castaneda

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT KRAMER, Plaintiff-Appellant v. CORRECTIONAL OFFICER A. CASTANEDA…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Apr 3, 2015

Citations

599 F. App'x 174 (5th Cir. 2015)

Citing Cases

Joseph v. Cooley

The Fifth Circuit occasionally treats an untimely notice of appeal filed within the 30-day period after the…

Hager v. Underwood

Hager's notice of appeal was dated July 9, 2018, and filed July 13, 2018. It was therefore untimely. But…