In Knokhinov, the court denied summary judgment because when the findings reported by one doctor are assessed by application of the standard of "normal" stated by the other doctors, the reports present "contradictory proof.
Summary of this case from Flowers v. KellyApril 19, 2010.
Insurance — No-Fault Automobile Insurance — Serious Injury.
In Knokhinov, the court denied summary judgment because when the findings reported by one doctor are assessed by application of the standard of "normal" stated by the other doctors, the reports present "contradictory proof.
Summary of this case from Flowers v. KellyIn Knokhinov, the court denied summary judgment because when the findings reported by one doctor are assessed by application of the standard of "normal" stated by the other doctors, the reports present "contradictory proof".
Summary of this case from Hoyte v. DavisIn Knokhinov, the court denied summary judgment because when the findings reported by one doctor are assessed by application of the standard of "normal" stated by the other doctors, the reports present "contradictory proof".
Summary of this case from Williams v. AbbasIn Knokhinov, the court denied summary judgment because when the findings reported by one doctor are assessed by application of the standard of "normal" stated by the other doctors, the reports present "contradictory proof".
Summary of this case from Asadov v. DiazIn Knokhinov, the court denied summary judgment because when the findings reported by one doctor are assessed by application of the standard of "normal" stated by the other doctors, the reports present "contradictory proof".
Summary of this case from Guzman v. DraytonIn Knokhinov, the court denied summary judgment because when the findings reported by one doctor are assessed by application of the standard of "normal" stated by the other doctors, the reports present "contradictory proof".
Summary of this case from Theodore v. NimmonsIn Knokhinov, the court denied summary judgment because when the findings reported by one doctor are assessed by application of the standard of "normal" stated by the other doctors, the reports present "contradictory proof".
Summary of this case from Vasquez v. Perez-FrancoIn Knokhinov, the court denied summary judgment because when the findings reported by one doctor are assessed by application of the standard of "normal" stated by the other doctors, the reports present "contradictory proof".
Summary of this case from Trowell v. CabralIn Knokhinov, the court denied summary judgment because when the findings reported by one doctor are assessed by application of the standard of "normal" stated by the other doctors, the reports present "contradictory proof".
Summary of this case from Benjamin v. Hussein Khachab & Luxor Limo Inc.In Knokhinov, the court denied summary judgment because when the findings reported by one doctor are assessed by application of the standard of "normal" stated by the other doctors, the reports present "contradictory proof".
Summary of this case from Abreu v. Braga Corp.Full title:Knokhinov v. Murray
Court:Supreme Court of the State of New York. Kings County
Date published: Apr 19, 2010
However, in opposition the plaintiff raises triable issues of fact as Dr. Baum finds loss in range of motion…
Hoyte v. DavisHowever, in opposition the plaintiff raises triable issues of fact as Dr. Kaplan finds loss in range of…