From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Knight v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Nov 13, 2002
832 So. 2d 172 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Summary

affirming order denying motion for postconviction relief where the "plea colloquy contain[ed] no indication that the sentence was to be coterminous with any other sentence"

Summary of this case from Eady v. State

Opinion

Case No. 3D02-2721

Opinion filed November 13, 2002. Rehearing Denied December 18, 2002.

An appeal under Fla.R.App.P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Marc Schumacher, Judge. L.T. No. 01-21216.

Willie Knight, in proper person.

Richard E. Doran, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before COPE, GERSTEN and SHEVIN, JJ.


As the plea colloquy contains no indication that the sentence was to be coterminous with any other sentence, the order denying postconviction relief is affirmed.


Summaries of

Knight v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Nov 13, 2002
832 So. 2d 172 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

affirming order denying motion for postconviction relief where the "plea colloquy contain[ed] no indication that the sentence was to be coterminous with any other sentence"

Summary of this case from Eady v. State

affirming order denying motion for postconviction relief where the "plea colloquy contain[ed] no indication that the sentence was to be coterminous with any other sentence"

Summary of this case from Eady v. State

affirming denial of motion for post-conviction relief as "plea colloquy contains no indication that the sentence was to be coterminous with any other sentence"

Summary of this case from Llerena v. State
Case details for

Knight v. State

Case Details

Full title:WILLIE KNIGHT, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Nov 13, 2002

Citations

832 So. 2d 172 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Citing Cases

State v. Lyons

The rule could accordingly be used to make the type of correction appellant sought. The problem, however, is…

Llerena v. State

Concurrent sentences do not necessarily begin at the same time, and unless they are ordered to be…