Eady v. State

Full title: Tauron EADY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Date published: Jan 23, 2019

273 So. 3d 97 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)

Opinion

No. 3D18-2013

01-23-2019

Tauron EADY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Tauron Eady, in proper person. Ashley Brooke Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Tauron Eady, in proper person.

Ashley Brooke Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before EMAS, C.J., and SALTER and FERNANDEZ, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Cox v. State, 221 So.3d 723, 725 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017) (holding: "Unlike a motion for postconviction relief pursuant to rule 3.850, a motion to correct illegal sentence pursuant to rule 3.800(a) places the burden upon the defendant ... to affirmatively identify court records which, on their face, demonstrate the existence of an illegal sentence or an entitlement to relief under rule 3.800(a)"); Llerena v. State, 953 So.2d 31, 33 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) (noting: "Concurrent sentences do not necessarily begin at the same time, and unless they are ordered to be coterminous, they will expire on different dates"); Knight v. State, 832 So.2d 172, 172 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) (affirming order denying motion for postconviction relief where the "plea colloquy contain[ed] no indication that the sentence was to be coterminous with any other sentence").