From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Klehm v. Chicago Title Trust Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District. Fifth Division
Dec 29, 1972
292 N.E.2d 451 (Ill. App. Ct. 1972)

Summary

In Klehm the court published the syllabus only and held that where no actual notice of a chancery call was given to the parties they could not be considered to have received constructive notice through publication in the Chicago Law Bulletin when one party's attorney was ill in another state.

Summary of this case from Flooring Co. v. Constr. Co.

Opinion

No. 56251 Order affirmed.

December 29, 1972. Abstract of Decision

APPEAL from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. DANIEL A. COVELLI, Judge, presiding.

McDermott, Will Emery, of Chicago, (Hamilton Smith and James E. Betke, of counsel,) for appellants.

Frederick C. Cappetta, of Chicago, (Martin J. Whalen, of counsel,) for appellees.


Abstract of Decision


Summaries of

Klehm v. Chicago Title Trust Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District. Fifth Division
Dec 29, 1972
292 N.E.2d 451 (Ill. App. Ct. 1972)

In Klehm the court published the syllabus only and held that where no actual notice of a chancery call was given to the parties they could not be considered to have received constructive notice through publication in the Chicago Law Bulletin when one party's attorney was ill in another state.

Summary of this case from Flooring Co. v. Constr. Co.
Case details for

Klehm v. Chicago Title Trust Co.

Case Details

Full title:CARL G. KLEHM et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CHICAGO TITLE AND TRUST…

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois, First District. Fifth Division

Date published: Dec 29, 1972

Citations

292 N.E.2d 451 (Ill. App. Ct. 1972)
292 N.E.2d 451

Citing Cases

Flooring Co. v. Constr. Co.

There appear to be few authorities, however, on the issue of whether newspaper notification in the absence of…