From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

KIK v. SBRACCIA

Michigan Court of Appeals
Dec 9, 2005
268 Mich. App. 801 (Mich. Ct. App. 2005)

Opinion

Docket No. 256419.

Order Entered December 9, 2005.


The Court orders that a special panel be convened pursuant to MCR 7.215(J) to resolve the conflict between this case and Wesche v. Mecosta Co Rd Comm, 267 Mich App 274; 705 NW2d 136 (2005).

The Court further orders that part III of the opinion released on November 15, 2005, which addresses the availability of damages for loss of consortium in a bodily injury or property damage claim brought pursuant to MCL 691.1405, is vacated. MCR 7.215(J)(5).

Appellants may file a supplemental brief within 21 days of the Clerk's certification of this order. Appellees may file a supplemental brief within 21 days of service of appellants' brief. Nine copies must be filed with the Clerk of the Court.

GAGE, J., did not participate.


Summaries of

KIK v. SBRACCIA

Michigan Court of Appeals
Dec 9, 2005
268 Mich. App. 801 (Mich. Ct. App. 2005)
Case details for

KIK v. SBRACCIA

Case Details

Full title:KIK v. SBRACCIA

Court:Michigan Court of Appeals

Date published: Dec 9, 2005

Citations

268 Mich. App. 801 (Mich. Ct. App. 2005)

Citing Cases

Wesche v. Mecosta

Like the original Court of Appeals panel, we will assume for purposes of our analysis that Sharon was born…

Kik v. Sbraccia

BORRELLO, J. This conflict panel was convened to resolve an inconsistency between the vacated portion of this…