From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kent v. Friedman

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 22, 1885
3 N.E. 905 (N.Y. 1885)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

In Kent v. Friedman, (17 Wkly Dig. 484) Judge LEARNED in his opinion says: "There can be no difference between an executory contract to sell and deliver goods of such and such a quality and an executory contract to sell and deliver goods which the vendor warrants to be of such and such a quality.

Summary of this case from Fairbank Canning Co. v. Metzger
See 1 Summary

Opinion

Submitted December 4, 1885

Decided December 22, 1885

Alex. Cumming for appellant.

D.S. Richards for respondents.

EARL, J., reads for affirmance.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.

Summaries of

Kent v. Friedman

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 22, 1885
3 N.E. 905 (N.Y. 1885)

In Kent v. Friedman, (17 Wkly Dig. 484) Judge LEARNED in his opinion says: "There can be no difference between an executory contract to sell and deliver goods of such and such a quality and an executory contract to sell and deliver goods which the vendor warrants to be of such and such a quality.

Summary of this case from Fairbank Canning Co. v. Metzger
Case details for

Kent v. Friedman

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE A. KENT et al., Respondents, v . LEONARD FRIEDMAN, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Dec 22, 1885

Citations

3 N.E. 905 (N.Y. 1885)
3 N.E. 905

Citing Cases

Fairbank Canning Co. v. Metzger

Judge EARL in delivering the opinion of the court after collating and discussing the authorities upon the…

Zabriskie v. C.V.R.R. Co.

"We are, however, of the opinion that, upon the evidence, the contract contained a warranty of quality which…

9 Citing Cases