From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kennedy v. Garland

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Dec 22, 2021
No. 21-1870 (4th Cir. Dec. 22, 2021)

Opinion

21-1871

12-22-2021

MICHAEL E. KENNEDY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States, Defendant-Appellee.

Michael Edward Kennedy, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Submitted: December 21, 2021

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, Senior District Judge. (1:21-cv-01634-CCB)

Michael Edward Kennedy, Appellant Pro Se.

Before KING and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM.

Michael E. Kennedy appeals the district court's order dismissing his petition for a writ of mandamus. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. See Kennedy v. Garland, No. 1:21-cv-01634-CCB (D. Md. July 9, 2021). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Kennedy v. Garland

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Dec 22, 2021
No. 21-1870 (4th Cir. Dec. 22, 2021)
Case details for

Kennedy v. Garland

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL E. KENNEDY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Dec 22, 2021

Citations

No. 21-1870 (4th Cir. Dec. 22, 2021)

Citing Cases

Whatley v. Charleston Cnty. Bd. of Elections

To the contrary, there is ample state law that would arguably apply here.See, e.g., SC Code §§ 7-13-1610…