In State v. Kastle, 120 Neb. 758, 235 N.W. 458, this court said: "When no bill of exceptions, showing the evidence, is presented on review, instructions that might have been proper under any evidence that might have been legally admissible under the pleadings or information will not be held prejudicial and erroneous.
Summary of this case from Shanahan v. StateDecided November 7, 1985
JUDGMENT AFFIRMED
In State v. Kastle, 120 Neb. 758, 235 N.W. 458, this court said: "When no bill of exceptions, showing the evidence, is presented on review, instructions that might have been proper under any evidence that might have been legally admissible under the pleadings or information will not be held prejudicial and erroneous.
Summary of this case from Shanahan v. StateFull title:KASTLE v. STATE OF NEW YORK
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Date published: Nov 7, 1985
In Willis v. State, 27 Neb. 98, 42 N.W. 920, this court said: "Where a case is presented upon the transcript…
Haynes v. NeshewatMontana: In re CH, 318 Mont 208, 214; 79 P3d 822 (2003). Nebraska: State v Kastle, 120 Neb 758, 772; 235 NW…